James Foster

James Foster

James Foster (@JamesEFoster) appears to be a London‑based social media commentator, known for posting political opinions and commentary, especially about UK politics and the Labour Party leadership. His X profile shows that he joined in April 2009 and posts frequently about political topics and debates.

https://twitter.com/JamesEFoster

23, April #StarmerCrisis

James Foster: They’re already in an “electoral death spiral”...

They’re already in an “electoral death spiral” and it’s being led by @Keir_Starmer . You’d may wish to continue being his chief fluffer, @MatthewStadlen , but @UKLabour MPs (having seen the disaster in May) will be concerned for their seats.

#StarmerCrisis

21, April

James Foster: They’ve finally twigged…

They’ve finally twigged: "Labour can’t make the mistakes the Democrats made. Biden left it too late to go and helped usher in Trump. Keir is helping usher in Farage."

21, April

James Foster: He shouldn’t have been appointed…

“He shouldn’t have been appointed,” says @Ed_Miliband . That’s clear enough. We all knew that. What isn’t clear is why it took you so long to say it or why none had the courage to say, “nah, I’m out” and resign. Only now @Keir_Starmer is toast are you starting to turn.

20, April

James Foster: People can see Mandelson was dodgy…

“People can see Mandelson was dodgy and the victims are owed a full inquiry.” Yet @Keir_Starmer appointed him anyway and before the vetting had been completed. You look like the embarrassing sycophant you are, @paulmasonnews , and it’s disgraceful to use concern for victims now.

20, April

James Foster: This is about the judgment of @Keir_Starmer…

This is about the judgment of @Keir_Starmer . He promised change — competence, stability, and an end to the chaos. We were told he was forensic and across the detail. The Mandelson affair shows us he’s as bad as the rest — in some cases worse — and he needs to go.

20, April

James Foster: Exactly. @Keir_Starmer…

Exactly. @Keir_Starmer couldn’t be bothered to wait for the vetting because he wanted Peter Mandelson. Terrible way to go about things but even worse given you’re the former DPP. He needs to stop blaming other people and he needs to stop taking people for fools.

19, April

James Foster: . @Keir_Starmer wasn’t interested…

. @Keir_Starmer wasn’t interested in the vetting because he expected it to go in his favour. That’s why he appointed Mandelson before the vetting was completed — and why he had no concerns. Because he wanted it on his terms. That’s the problem. Now, it’s all falling apart.